Introduction In a issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association, an article titled "It's Over Debbie" describes how an anonymous doctor administers a fatal dose of morphine to a woman dying of ovarian cancer Anonymous,
Many people support the right of a terminally ill patient to die - but what if the right becomes an obligation??? And what of the potential for abuse by impatient heirs???
Should dying patients have the right to order their doctors not to start or continue medical treatment? Should doctors be protected from prosecution if they shorten a patient's life expectancy with pain-killing drugs? Most of us would answer yes to both questions. But does this mean we need a "right to die" law?
Or is there more to the issue than first meets the eye? Public discussion of the treatment of dying patients often confuses two separate issues. First, is the right of the terminally ill person to be allowed to die without being subjected to invasive medical procedures?
Second, is the question of whether a dying person should also have the right to hasten his or her own death, and require the help of doctors and nurses to do so. A doctor who treats a patient against his or her express wishes can be charged with assault.
It would be wise to educate people as to their right to refuse treatment. There is no need to convert this well established legal principle into legislation. Regardless of the intention of "right to die" or "aid in dying" laws, they could very easily open the door to active euthanasia.
In the present climate of opinion, it is easy to imagine a doctor giving a lethal dose of pain-killing drug and then claiming that death was the best way to eliminate physical suffering.
If the doctor could also show that the patient had requested the lethal dosage, the court might well interpret the law in the doctor's favor. Many do not find the prospect of legal voluntary active euthanasia in any way alarming.
But two things should give us pause. First, as a soon-to-be-published Canadian study will show, most health care professionals who work with the dying endorse the patient's right to refuse medical treatment, but oppose legalizing active euthanasia.
The professionals recognize that if pain is controlled, as it can be in virtually all cases, very few terminally ill people ask to be put to death.
Second, experience in Holland tells us that voluntary Euthanasia can quickly become involuntary euthanasia. Active euthanasia is legal there, but for the past decade the government has not prosecuted doctors who report having assisted their patients to commit suicide.
A recent Dutch government investigation of euthanasia has come up with some disturbing findings. These findings were widely publicized before the November referendum in Washington State, and contributed to the defeat of the proposition to legalize lethal injections and assisted suicide.
The Dutch experience seems to demonstrate that the "right to die" can soon turn into an obligation. This concept is dangerous, and you could find yourself the victim if Euthanasia becomes legal in North America.
We have all heard and some of us have experienced, moving stories of elderly people in great pain, unable to perform even the most basic human functions, who have asked to die, or have perhaps brought about their own deaths.
What these stories overlook is that today, in almost all cases, it is possible to kill pain without killing the patient. When someone's pain is relieved that person usually wants to go on living. We need to reflect carefully on the consequences of legalizing active euthanasia.
If we enshrine the absolute right to die, will it then become illegal to intervene to obstruct would-be suicide? Will pharmacists be obligated to sell a lethal dose of hemlock to anyone who is temporarily depressed?Top 10 Reasons Euthanasia Should Be Legal Everywhere “Dying is not a crime” – Jack Kevorkian Dr.
Jack Kevorkian. Helga Esteb / yunusemremert.com Euthanasia, from the Greek word meaning “good death”, is the practice of assisted suicide with the intention of relieving pain and suffering. On June 26, , the US Supreme Court ruled that gay marriage is a right protected by the US Constitution in all 50 states.
Prior to their decision, same-sex marriage was already legal in 37 states and Washington DC, but was banned in the remaining Top 10 Reasons Euthanasia Should be Illegal In recent decades, there has been much of talk regarding euthanasia, the practice of ending a life in a painless way.
One of the greatest controversies surrounding the issue is whether or not it should be legalized. Euthanasia Should Not Be Legalized in America This Research Paper Euthanasia Should Not Be Legalized in America and other 64,+ term papers, college essay examples and free essays are available now on yunusemremert.com Autor: review • February 6, • Research Paper • Words (4 Pages) • Views4/4(1).
Free euthanasia papers, essays, and research papers. Euthanasi A Non Voluntary Euthanasia - Euthanasia is the fact of ending somebody’s life when assisting him to die peacefully without pain.
Euthanasia refers to the intentional bringing about of the death of a patient, either by killing him/her, or by letting him/her die, for the patient’s sake to prevent further pain or suffering from a terminal illness.
Euthanasia is a complex issue in many underlying theological, sociological.