Identification and evaluation of sources In Section 1, you will analyse two key sources used in your investigation.
This is a relatively brief but important section.
A sharply focused question and a clearly structured plan will be more likely to produce a successful investigation. Tips to writing a great 3 of 3 marks Section A Avoid first person. Do not use personal pronouns.
A way to avoid this is to think of the investigation in third person. Start the section with your question: This investigation will answer the question, [insert question here].
Be sure to use the word scope.
|Assessment Criteria for Section 1||You will demonstrate skills and knowledge, and you can follow your personal interests, without the time limitations and other constraints that are associated with written exams. How to use this website.|
|How to Write an Outline - Writing a Research Paper||What are the values and limitations of the time period you are researching? Suggested Questions for Answering What methods used by historians did you use in your investigation?|
|IB History Survival Guide||What you need to know before you write: Avoid quotes from the article and introductions longer than 2 sentences.|
The scope of the investigation is The scope of this investigation focuses on Nixon's years as U. Finally, state your methods of research. How are you using two of your major sources?
Be sure to use the word method.
Be sure to describe how you are using TWO of your sources. There isn't a need to list the author s unless they are extremely important to your question.
Considering using the I. Command Terms listed below. One method to be used in this investigation is an examination of [insert the name of one of your better sources]. History Command Terms Analyze Break down in order to bring out the essential elements or structure.
Compare Give an account of the similarities between two or more items or situations, referring to both all of them throughout.
Compare and contrast Give an account of similarities and differences between two or more items or situations, referring to both all of them throughout. Contrast Give an account of the differences between two or more items or situations, referring to both all of them throughout.
Define Give the precise meaning of a word, phrase, concept or physical quantity. Describe Give a detailed account. Discuss Offer a considered and balanced review that includes a range of arguments, factors or hypotheses.
Opinions or conclusions should be presented clearly and supported by appropriate evidence. Distinguish Make clear the differences between two or more concepts or items. Evaluate Make an appraisal by weighing up the strengths and limitations.
Examine Consider an argument or concept in a way that uncovers the assumptions and interrelationships of the issue. Explain Give a detailed account including reasons or causes.
Identify Provide an answer from a number of possibilities. Justify Give valid reasons or evidence to support an answer or conclusion. There is some analysis and evaluation of two sources, but reference to their value and limitations is limited. Many candidates scored well in this section.
As usual some lost marks because of the methodology or scope were not clearly explained or developed. The formulation of the research topic as a question certainly improves the focus of the investigation.Jan 30, · Use this video as a guide to help with Part C of your history IA research paper.
This is only an introduction, more information can be found on our website. How to write the IA This is a fantastic evaluation of how to construct and what to consider in the IA.
However LINK TO IA EVALUATION, DO NOT add too much detail that should be added to paper to footnoting (or endnotes, if that's what you choose) to get around the word-count.
In the first paragraph of your Section 1, you need to provide the context of your investigation, and then directly state your research question, in its full form, and make it stand out. "Identification of sources, and explanation of the relevance of the sources to the investigation.".
How to Structure an Economics IA This post will go through what you should write in your Economics IA, with step-by-step instructions and with word counts for each section. What you need to know before you write.
What is the History Internal Assessment? A historical investigation consisting of a written account of between 1, and 2, words, divided into six sections: a plan of the investigation, a summary of evidence, an evaluation of sources, an analysis, a conclusion, and a list of sources (works cited).
History IA IB History of the Americas Choosing an Inappropriate Topic: A bad research question almost always leads to a bad paper. paper is that you will not include a thesis statement in Part A. In Part A, you merely pose a research question. Your answer to that question will gradually take form as you proceed write a paragraph.